Magazin

Up, up, and away – Big Gliders – Small Engines

von Emil Ch. Giezendanner
4

It had long been my dream to launch a large sailplane from our runway. For several years, I followed the relevant technical developments with great interest. I am pleased to note that new and exciting opportunities have opened up for those of us who love self-launches.


A Joyful Look Back

I fondly remember the old days when the first large-scale glider models appeared—it must have been between 1975 and 1985—and a real community began to form, such as the IGG, founded in 1982 by Peter Äberli and Georg Staub. Beautiful models by Ernst Tscheulin, and later by Christian Gierke and others, took the gliding world by storm. Tscheulin’s models and others were available as kits with fiberglass fuselages and Styrofoam-Abachi wings. Others purchased only the fuselages and built the wings themselves—a labor-intensive and demanding task. This technique is still used today, refined by a few specialists. Covering the wings with the films available back then was a challenge and caused me to utter numerous curses. Most of our flying sites had only slight elevations. In addition, we had to clear trees and bushes to take advantage of the slope-generated updrafts. High-altitude launches and motorized winches helped us do this.



A big step

But suddenly everything changed: Starting in 1973, we held the first electric aircraft air shows in Pfäffikon. The air shows associated with these events increasingly took on the character of a “product showcase,” where more powerful electric motors (by Fritz Geist and Heinz Keller) were soon put to use. Suddenly, ground launches with aerobatic models were possible (Heinz Elsässer) and—this surprised us in particular—Ernst Tscheulin’s demonstrations with his large gliders (Glasflügel 604, Kestrel, LS 2). A few steps for a hand launch, and his 5-meter model soared leisurely into the sky. That broke the spell. Without further ado, the noses were brutally sawed off the beautiful fuselages of our models, and starting around 1980, a “Keller 80 or 100” was installed. Initially, we used nickel-cadmium cells (NiCad, banned since 2006) and later nickel-metal hydride (NiMH) cells. The packs, containing up to 20 cells, quickly added 1 kg or more to the payload. This was no problem for the large gliders (about 3.5 to 5 m). At times, we had half a dozen or more of these elegant and virtually silent gliders in the air.



A feast for us—a nightmare for others

One beautiful Sunday (around 1980), guests from Lake Zurich arrived at our slope-soaring site with their beautiful large-scale glider models. Before long, heated discussions broke out over our barbarically sawed-off fuselage noses. The enthusiasts of beautiful glider “orchids” were more or less appalled—though this did nothing to dampen our friendship. Over drinks later on, we learned that in the large-scale glider scene, aesthetics—even to this day, by the way—are highly valued, whereas for us, trouble-free launches on a somewhat challenging terrain were the priority. For the larger and heavier models, however, the hand launch became a challenge. Here, too, the “Seebuben” offered us development assistance with their catapult.


Large sailing ships capable of sailing under their own power have arrived

For several years now, large gliders equipped with electric motors have been accepted. In kit form, the fuselages are even designed with this in mind. Electric propulsion has also sparked a “quiet revolution” in manned gliding. In addition to the widely used retractable engines, electric motors built into the nose of the fuselage are also being used in this field. The technical term for this is “FES” = Front Electric Sustainer. This



Continued on page 26 →


Getting Started with Electric Motors
An Attempt at a TypologyDescriptionComment
Launch car

with folding propeller at the nose of the fuselage
The old “launch cart” concept is still relevant and rewardingWhether built yourself or purchased

, the height or ground clearance of the propeller can be adjusted, allowing for larger propeller diameters (at low RPMs—very quiet!).
Folding engine with propellerCapable

of self-launch; very powerful, good climb rates
Large cutouts in the fuselage must be reinforced. Standard landing gear
Impeller retractable engineCapable

of self-launch. Technically elegant solution. Requires more initial speed during takeoff (impeller airflow)
Requires less space in the fuselage. Impeller-driven engines generally require faster flight speeds. Standard landing gear
FES “weak”Ground launch not possible.

Requires a tow launch and serves as a “calm-weather glider”
Very simple to implement and install. Moderate cost (motor, speed controller, batteries). Standard landing gear

An interesting combination of a towed launch and a motor-assisted takeoff aid
FES “strong”Capable

of self-launch. Multiple rapid climbs (depending on the battery).
More powerful motorization (motor, speed controller, batteries)

. Issue with propeller clearance (small, high-RPM propellers cause unpleasant noise). Two-stage landing gear as a solution. Possibly adjust the fuselage longitudinal section—slightly higher fuselage tips.


1
2



propCalc - Propeller Calculator

All information is provided without guarantee—Accuracy: +/-10%

GeneralModel weight: 12,000 g, including driveNumber of motors: 1 (powered by one battery)Wingspan: 6,000 mm / 236.22 inchesWing area: 105 dm² / 1,627.5 in²Drag coefficient: simplified (0.03 Cw)Flight altitude: 500 m above sea level / 1,640 ft above sea levelAir temperature: 25 °C / 77 °FAir pressure (QNH): 1,013 hPa / 29.91 inHg
Battery cellType: LiPo 4500 mAh - 30/45C (standard)Configuration: 6S 1PCapacity: 4500 mAh (4500 mAh total)Max. discharge: 85%Resistance: 0.0038 ohmsVoltage: 3.7 VC-Rate: 30 C continuous / 45 C maxWeight: 113 g / 4 oz
ControllerType - Timing: CC Phoenix Edge Lite 100 (normal)Current: 100 A continuous / 100 A maxResistance: 0.0035 ohmsWeight: 92 g / 3.2 ozBattery extension wire: AWG10 = 5.27 mm²Length: 0 mm / 0 inchesExtension to motor: AWG10 = 5.27 mm²Length: 0 mm / 0 inch
MotorManufacturer - Model: Leomotion LEO 4130-0490 V3 (490) (medium)Kv: 490 U/VNo-load current: 1.8 A @ 10 VLimit (max. 15s): 2280 WResistance: 0.014 ohmsHousing length: 54 mm / 2.13 inchesNumber of magnetic poles: 14Weight: 392 g / 13.8 oz
PropellerType: GM (0°)Diameter: 15 inches / 381 mmPitch: 10 inches / 254 mmNumber of blades: 2PConst / TConst: 1.06 / 1.0Gear ratio: 1 : 1Airspeed: 0 km/h / 0 mphCalculate
BatteryMotor @ Optimal EfficiencyMotor @ MaximumPropellerTotal Propulsion SystemModel airplane
Discharge Rate: 18.48 C
Voltage: 20.30 V
Nominal Voltage: 22.20 V
Energy: 99.9 Wh
Total capacity: 4,500 mAh
Usable capacity: 3,825 mAh
Flight time at full throttle: 2.8 min
Average flight time: 3.3 min
Weight: 678 g / 23.9 oz
Current: 59.18 A
Voltage: 20.64 V
RPM*: 9,
359 el. Power: 1,221.7 W
mech. Power: 1,113.1 W
Efficiency: 91.1 %
Current: 83.18 A
Voltage: 20.01 V
RPM*: 8,875 rpm
Electrical power: 1,664.6 W
Mechanical Power: 1,506.0 W
Efficiency: 90.5%
Temperature (approx.): 79 °C / 174 °F

Wattmeter measurement
Current: 83.18 A
Voltage: 20.3 V
Power: 1,688.6 W
Stationary thrust: 7,153 g / 252.3 oz
Rotational speed*: 8,875 rpm
Thrust at stall: - g / - oz
Thrust at 0 km/h: 7,153 g / 252.3 oz
Pitch speed: 135 km/h / 84 mph
Tip speed: 637 km/h / 396 mph
Specific thrust: 3.68 g/W / 0.13 oz/W
Components: 1,278 g / 45.1 oz
Power-to-weight ratio: 154 W/kg / 70 W/lb
Thrust-to-weight ratio: 0.60 : 1
Current @ max: 83.18 A
P(in) @ max: 1846.6 W
P(out) @ max: 1506.0 W
Efficiency @ max: 81.6%
Torque: 1.62 Nm / 1.19 lbf·ft
Climb rate: 1211 m / 3973 ft
Takeoff weight: 12,000 g / 423.3 oz
Wing loading: 114.3 g/dm² / 37.5 oz/ft²
Cubic wing loading: 11.2
Stall speed: 51 km/h / 32 mph
Horizontal speed: 103 km/h / 64 mph
Vertical speed: - km/h / - mph
Climb rate: 7.3 m/s (~25...30°) / 1,440 ft/min

Propulsion according to e-Calc.



3



4


My choice: Chocofly SB-14 (6 m)

If you look into the many suppliers of large sailboats, you’ll find a huge selection. However, not all models are readily available—so patience is key. I’ve had good experiences with Chocofly. So I’ll start by checking out what’s available from “local” suppliers.


My criteria were:
  • Slow thermal flying is possible—not a “specialized” racing glider
  • Easy to fly (from what I’ve heard)
  • FES propulsion (easy installation of a motor in the fuselage nose)
  • Two-stage landing gear fits
  • High-wing configuration (distance from wing to ground facilitates ground takeoff/landing)
  • The battery should fit in front of the landing gear—another reason for using only 6b cells

The design and configuration of the powerplant by Leomotion have proven to be absolutely trouble-free and successful in practical operation. The takeoff distance on a paved runway is 10 to 15 m. Takeoff is also easy on closely mowed grass. Two climb flights with a little reserve to “make it back.” Flights that are worthwhile in thermals. And the others are simply wonderful experiences.


Chocofly SB 14 Technical Specifications and Equipment
Wingspan:6,000 cm
Fuselage length:2,033 cm
Takeoff weight:10,360 g
Motor:Leomotion 4130 (490 RPM per volt)
Speed controller:Summit 100 Light. 8 A BEC, regenerative braking
Battery:6S LiPo 3700 mAh
Propeller:15 x 10 inches
RPM:8,875 rpm
Current:84 A
Power:1,700 W



Show all categories →

NEWS

Sort by:
Further articles →



An error has occurred. This application may no longer respond until reloaded. Reload 🗙